<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retro Candy Flashback: Baby Ruth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/12/30/retro-candy-flashback-baby-ruth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/12/30/retro-candy-flashback-baby-ruth/</link>
	<description>Candy news, views, and reviews. All the candy that's fit to eat, and some that isn't.  All candy, all the time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:48:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/12/30/retro-candy-flashback-baby-ruth/comment-page-1/#comment-99743</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/12/30/retro-candy-flashback-baby-ruth/#comment-99743</guid>
		<description>Notice when you get a bite of Baby Ruth with HARDLY ANY PEANUTS (clearly a factory mishap), the taste is pure heaven? I mean shockingly good, better than a Snickers bar or even the almighty Butterfinger? That&#039;s because Baby Ruths have WAY too many peanuts. The fun sized versions you get at Halloween don&#039;t have room for all those peanuts and you can actually taste the candy bar. There&#039;s a reason its been around over 70 years, its the candy bar under those peanuts. There&#039;re so many of them you&#039;ll cut your mouth trying to chew them all if you&#039;re not careful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice when you get a bite of Baby Ruth with HARDLY ANY PEANUTS (clearly a factory mishap), the taste is pure heaven? I mean shockingly good, better than a Snickers bar or even the almighty Butterfinger? That&#8217;s because Baby Ruths have WAY too many peanuts. The fun sized versions you get at Halloween don&#8217;t have room for all those peanuts and you can actually taste the candy bar. There&#8217;s a reason its been around over 70 years, its the candy bar under those peanuts. There&#8217;re so many of them you&#8217;ll cut your mouth trying to chew them all if you&#8217;re not careful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alix</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/12/30/retro-candy-flashback-baby-ruth/comment-page-1/#comment-99399</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/12/30/retro-candy-flashback-baby-ruth/#comment-99399</guid>
		<description>I agree with your rave review of Baby Ruths, but have you seen them lately? They ARE skimping on the peanuts now -- the bars are practically smooth. Boo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your rave review of Baby Ruths, but have you seen them lately? They ARE skimping on the peanuts now &#8212; the bars are practically smooth. Boo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carrie</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/12/30/retro-candy-flashback-baby-ruth/comment-page-1/#comment-99361</link>
		<dc:creator>carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/12/30/retro-candy-flashback-baby-ruth/#comment-99361</guid>
		<description>They did do a low carb version of baby ruth a couple of years back when that was all the rage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They did do a low carb version of baby ruth a couple of years back when that was all the rage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeni</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/12/30/retro-candy-flashback-baby-ruth/comment-page-1/#comment-99359</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/12/30/retro-candy-flashback-baby-ruth/#comment-99359</guid>
		<description>A Baby Ruth is one candy bar that is always around, but I never got around to trying one. It sounds too similar to the Snickers bar, which I dislike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Baby Ruth is one candy bar that is always around, but I never got around to trying one. It sounds too similar to the Snickers bar, which I dislike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
