<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Candy Theory of Relativity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/</link>
	<description>Candy news, views, and reviews. All the candy that's fit to eat, and some that isn't.  All candy, all the time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:48:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe nahhas</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-99723</link>
		<dc:creator>joe nahhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/#comment-99723</guid>
		<description>Einstein&#039;s Nemesis: DI Her Eclipsing Binary Stars Solution
The problem that the 100,000 PHD Physicists  could not solve  

This is the solution to the &quot;Quarter of a century&quot; Smithsonian-NASA Posted motion puzzle that Einstein and the 100,000 space-time physicists including 109 years of Nobel prize winner physics and physicists and 400 years of astronomy and Astrophysicists could not solve and solved here and dedicated to Drs Edward Guinan and Frank Maloney      
Of Villanova University Pennsylvania who posted this motion puzzle and started the search collections of stars with motion that can not be explained by any published physics   
For 350 years Physicists Astrophysicists and Mathematicians and all others including Newton and Kepler themselves missed the time-dependent Newton&#039;s equation and time dependent Kepler&#039;s equation that accounts for Quantum - relativistic effects and it explains these effects as visual effects. Here it is  

Universal- Mechanics

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location 
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product 

S = m r; State = mass x location

P = d S/d t = m (d r/dt) + (dm/dt) r = Total moment 

  = change of location + change of mass

  = m v + m&#039; r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m&#039; = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

   = m γ + 2m&#039;v +m&quot;r; γ = acceleration; m&#039;&#039; = mass acceleration rate

In polar coordinates system

r = r r(1) ;v = r&#039; r(1)  + r θ&#039; θ(1) ; γ = (r&quot; - rθ&#039;²)r(1) + (2r&#039;θ&#039; + rθ&quot;)θ(1)

F = m[(r&quot;-rθ&#039;²)r(1) + (2r&#039;θ&#039; + rθ&quot;)θ(1)] + 2m&#039;[r&#039;r(1) + rθ&#039;θ(1)] + (m&quot;r) r(1)
  
F = [d²(m r)/dt² - (m r)θ&#039;²]r(1) + (1/mr)[d(m²r²θ&#039;)/d t]θ(1) = [-GmM/r²]r(1)

d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ&#039;² = -GmM/r²; d (m²r²θ&#039;)/d t = 0

Let m =constant: M=constant

d²r/dt² -  r θ&#039;²=-GM/r²  ------ I

 d(r²θ&#039;)/d t = 0   -----------------II

r²θ&#039;=h = constant -------------- II     
                                                 r = 1/u; r&#039; = -u&#039;/u² = - r²u&#039; = - r²θ&#039;(d u/d θ) = -h (d u/d θ)                                 
d (r²θ&#039;)/d t = 2rr&#039;θ&#039; + r²θ&quot; = 0        r&quot; = - h d/d t (du/d θ) = - h θ&#039;(d²u/d θ²) = - (h²/r²)(d²u/dθ²)
                                                                  [- (h²/r²) (d²u/dθ²)] - r [(h/r²)²] = -GM/r²              
2(r&#039;/r) = - (θ&quot;/θ&#039;) = 2[λ + ỉ ω (t)]                              - h²u² (d²u/dθ²) - h²u³ = -GMu²
                                                                                                d²u/dθ² + u = GM/h²             
 r(θ, t) = r (θ, 0) Exp [λ + ỉ ω (t)]    u(θ,0) = GM/h² + Acosθ; r (θ, 0) = 1/(GM/h² + Acosθ)        
                                                         r ( θ, 0) = h²/GM/[1 + (Ah²/Gm)cosθ]      
r(θ,0) = a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)               ; h²/GM = a(1-ε²); ε = Ah²/GM                

 r(0,t)= Exp[λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)]t; Exp = Exponential

r = r(θ , t)=r(θ,0)r(0,t)=[a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[λ(r) + ì ω(r)]t} Nahhas&#039; Solution

If λ(r) ≈ 0; then:    

r (θ, t) = [(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[ỉ ω(r)t]

θ&#039;(r,  t) = θ&#039;[r(θ,0), 0]  Exp{-2ỉ[ω(r)t]} 

h = 2π a b/T; b=a√ (1-ε²); a = mean distance value; ε = eccentricity
h = 2πa²√ (1-ε²); r (0, 0) = a (1-ε)

θ&#039; (0,0) = h/r²(0,0) =  2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²   
θ&#039; (0,t) = θ&#039;(0,0)Exp(-2ỉwt)={2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²} Exp (-2iwt)
 
θ&#039;(0,t) = θ&#039;(0,0) [cosine 2(wt) - ỉ sine 2(wt)] = θ&#039;(0,0) [1- 2sine² (wt) - ỉ sin 2(wt)] 
θ&#039;(0,t) = θ&#039;(0,t)(x) + θ&#039;(0,t)(y); θ&#039;(0,t)(x) = θ&#039;(0,0)[ 1- 2sine² (wt)]  
θ&#039;(0,t)(x) – θ&#039;(0,0) = - 2θ&#039;(0,0)sine²(wt) = - 2θ&#039;(0,0)(v/c)²  v/c=sine wt; c=light speed

Δ θ&#039; = [θ&#039;(0, t) - θ&#039;(0, 0)] = -4π {[√ (1-ε) ²]/T (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ²} radians/second
{(180/π=degrees) x (36526=century) 

Δ θ&#039; = [-720x36526/ T (days)] {[√ (1-ε) ²]/ (1-ε) ²}(v/c) = 1.04°/century

This is the T-Rex equation that is going to demolished Einstein&#039;s space-jail of time
  
The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²---) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)
 v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m&lt;&lt;M; Solar system    

 v = v (center of mass); v is the sum of orbital/rotational velocities = v(cm) for DI Her
Let m = mass of primary; M = mass of secondary

v (m) = primary speed; v(M) = secondary speed = √[Gm²/(m+M)a(1-ε²/4)]
v (cm) = [m v(m) + M v(M)]/(m + M)   All rights reserved. joenahhas1958@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Einstein&#8217;s Nemesis: DI Her Eclipsing Binary Stars Solution<br />
The problem that the 100,000 PHD Physicists  could not solve  </p>
<p>This is the solution to the &#8220;Quarter of a century&#8221; Smithsonian-NASA Posted motion puzzle that Einstein and the 100,000 space-time physicists including 109 years of Nobel prize winner physics and physicists and 400 years of astronomy and Astrophysicists could not solve and solved here and dedicated to Drs Edward Guinan and Frank Maloney<br />
Of Villanova University Pennsylvania who posted this motion puzzle and started the search collections of stars with motion that can not be explained by any published physics<br />
For 350 years Physicists Astrophysicists and Mathematicians and all others including Newton and Kepler themselves missed the time-dependent Newton&#8217;s equation and time dependent Kepler&#8217;s equation that accounts for Quantum &#8211; relativistic effects and it explains these effects as visual effects. Here it is  </p>
<p>Universal- Mechanics</p>
<p>All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location<br />
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product </p>
<p>S = m r; State = mass x location</p>
<p>P = d S/d t = m (d r/dt) + (dm/dt) r = Total moment </p>
<p>  = change of location + change of mass</p>
<p>  = m v + m&#8217; r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m&#8217; = mass change rate</p>
<p>F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r</p>
<p>   = m γ + 2m&#8217;v +m&#8221;r; γ = acceleration; m&#8221; = mass acceleration rate</p>
<p>In polar coordinates system</p>
<p>r = r r(1) ;v = r&#8217; r(1)  + r θ&#8217; θ(1) ; γ = (r&#8221; &#8211; rθ&#8217;²)r(1) + (2r&#8217;θ&#8217; + rθ&#8221;)θ(1)</p>
<p>F = m[(r"-rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + rθ")θ(1)] + 2m&#8217;[r'r(1) + rθ'θ(1)] + (m&#8221;r) r(1)</p>
<p>F = [d²(m r)/dt² - (m r)θ'²]r(1) + (1/mr)[d(m²r²θ')/d t]θ(1) = [-GmM/r²]r(1)</p>
<p>d² (m r)/dt² &#8211; (m r) θ&#8217;² = -GmM/r²; d (m²r²θ&#8217;)/d t = 0</p>
<p>Let m =constant: M=constant</p>
<p>d²r/dt² &#8211;  r θ&#8217;²=-GM/r²  &#8212;&#8212; I</p>
<p> d(r²θ&#8217;)/d t = 0   &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;II</p>
<p>r²θ&#8217;=h = constant &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; II<br />
                                                 r = 1/u; r&#8217; = -u&#8217;/u² = &#8211; r²u&#8217; = &#8211; r²θ&#8217;(d u/d θ) = -h (d u/d θ)<br />
d (r²θ&#8217;)/d t = 2rr&#8217;θ&#8217; + r²θ&#8221; = 0        r&#8221; = &#8211; h d/d t (du/d θ) = &#8211; h θ&#8217;(d²u/d θ²) = &#8211; (h²/r²)(d²u/dθ²)<br />
                                                                  [- (h²/r²) (d²u/dθ²)] &#8211; r [(h/r²)²] = -GM/r²<br />
2(r&#8217;/r) = &#8211; (θ&#8221;/θ&#8217;) = 2[λ + ỉ ω (t)]                              &#8211; h²u² (d²u/dθ²) &#8211; h²u³ = -GMu²<br />
                                                                                                d²u/dθ² + u = GM/h²<br />
 r(θ, t) = r (θ, 0) Exp [λ + ỉ ω (t)]    u(θ,0) = GM/h² + Acosθ; r (θ, 0) = 1/(GM/h² + Acosθ)<br />
                                                         r ( θ, 0) = h²/GM/[1 + (Ah²/Gm)cosθ]<br />
r(θ,0) = a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)               ; h²/GM = a(1-ε²); ε = Ah²/GM                </p>
<p> r(0,t)= Exp[λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)]t; Exp = Exponential</p>
<p>r = r(θ , t)=r(θ,0)r(0,t)=[a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[λ(r) + ì ω(r)]t} Nahhas&#8217; Solution</p>
<p>If λ(r) ≈ 0; then:    </p>
<p>r (θ, t) = [(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[ỉ ω(r)t]</p>
<p>θ&#8217;(r,  t) = θ&#8217;[r(θ,0), 0]  Exp{-2ỉ[ω(r)t]} </p>
<p>h = 2π a b/T; b=a√ (1-ε²); a = mean distance value; ε = eccentricity<br />
h = 2πa²√ (1-ε²); r (0, 0) = a (1-ε)</p>
<p>θ&#8217; (0,0) = h/r²(0,0) =  2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²<br />
θ&#8217; (0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,0)Exp(-2ỉwt)={2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²} Exp (-2iwt)</p>
<p>θ&#8217;(0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,0) [cosine 2(wt) - ỉ sine 2(wt)] = θ&#8217;(0,0) [1- 2sine² (wt) - ỉ sin 2(wt)]<br />
θ&#8217;(0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,t)(x) + θ&#8217;(0,t)(y); θ&#8217;(0,t)(x) = θ&#8217;(0,0)[ 1- 2sine² (wt)]<br />
θ&#8217;(0,t)(x) – θ&#8217;(0,0) = &#8211; 2θ&#8217;(0,0)sine²(wt) = &#8211; 2θ&#8217;(0,0)(v/c)²  v/c=sine wt; c=light speed</p>
<p>Δ θ&#8217; = [θ'(0, t) - θ'(0, 0)] = -4π {[√ (1-ε) ²]/T (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ²} radians/second<br />
{(180/π=degrees) x (36526=century) </p>
<p>Δ θ&#8217; = [-720x36526/ T (days)] {[√ (1-ε) ²]/ (1-ε) ²}(v/c) = 1.04°/century</p>
<p>This is the T-Rex equation that is going to demolished Einstein&#8217;s space-jail of time</p>
<p>The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 &#8211; ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²&#8212;) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)<br />
 v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m&lt;&lt;M; Solar system    </p>
<p> v = v (center of mass); v is the sum of orbital/rotational velocities = v(cm) for DI Her<br />
Let m = mass of primary; M = mass of secondary</p>
<p>v (m) = primary speed; v(M) = secondary speed = √[Gm²/(m+M)a(1-ε²/4)]<br />
v (cm) = [m v(m) + M v(M)]/(m + M)   All rights reserved. <a href="mailto:joenahhas1958@yahoo.com">joenahhas1958@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-99179</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/#comment-99179</guid>
		<description>Freeze the 3 musketeers bar, before you unwrap it hit it with a hammer and shatter it. Then you have delectable little melt-in-your-mouth pieces! Try this method on milky way, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freeze the 3 musketeers bar, before you unwrap it hit it with a hammer and shatter it. Then you have delectable little melt-in-your-mouth pieces! Try this method on milky way, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeni</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-98131</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/#comment-98131</guid>
		<description>I love frozen Reese&#039;s! Also frozen cherry cordial Kisses. Yum :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love frozen Reese&#8217;s! Also frozen cherry cordial Kisses. Yum :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robby</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-96878</link>
		<dc:creator>Robby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/#comment-96878</guid>
		<description>The problem with a 3 Musketeers is, in my opinion, the nougat. I don&#039;t like nougat chilled because it becomes incredibly hard and tastes weird. It&#039;s almost like a more extreme version of the frozen Charleston Chew. I say try it if you want to know what I am talking about, but I personally avoid freezing any candy with nougat or marshmallow. I suggest basic chocolates, liquid centers, caramel-filling, or peanut butter to work best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with a 3 Musketeers is, in my opinion, the nougat. I don&#8217;t like nougat chilled because it becomes incredibly hard and tastes weird. It&#8217;s almost like a more extreme version of the frozen Charleston Chew. I say try it if you want to know what I am talking about, but I personally avoid freezing any candy with nougat or marshmallow. I suggest basic chocolates, liquid centers, caramel-filling, or peanut butter to work best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfidy</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-96870</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/#comment-96870</guid>
		<description>I have frozen a 3 Musketeers.  It was really hard to eat.  I think ifI wanted to try it again, I would do those little bite size square ones instead of the whole full-size bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have frozen a 3 Musketeers.  It was really hard to eat.  I think ifI wanted to try it again, I would do those little bite size square ones instead of the whole full-size bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sania</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-96843</link>
		<dc:creator>Sania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/#comment-96843</guid>
		<description>Why shouldn&#039;t you freeze a 3 Musketeers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why shouldn&#8217;t you freeze a 3 Musketeers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-96801</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/#comment-96801</guid>
		<description>On Robby&#039;s advice, I tried freezing &lt;a href=&quot;http://candyaddict.com/blog/2007/10/12/candy-review-twix-java/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twix Java&lt;/a&gt; bars and they are great that way! I would have never tried that without Robby&#039;s advice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Robby&#8217;s advice, I tried freezing <a href="http://candyaddict.com/blog/2007/10/12/candy-review-twix-java/" rel="nofollow">Twix Java</a> bars and they are great that way! I would have never tried that without Robby&#8217;s advice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosa</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/comment-page-1/#comment-96797</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/2008/07/17/candy-theory-of-relativity/#comment-96797</guid>
		<description>Frozen Charleston Chews are a revelation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frozen Charleston Chews are a revelation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
