My life is now complete since I have found chocolate-covered pork rinds! Seriously, who comes up with these ideas? They come in milk, dark, and white chocolate, but the most amazing thing about it is that the chocolate is sugar-free. If you are going to dip pork rinds in chocolate, why not go all out? Why make it sugar-free?
I guess if you can have chocolate-covered bacon and gummi bacon, you can have chocolate-covered pork rinds. I’ve never been particularly fond of pork rinds and I don’t think covering them in sugar-free chocolate is going to make me like them more.
[via More candy articles about: candy, sweets, chocolate, pork, bacon, rinds, pork rinds, weird, gross, odd, yuck
Ewww. Just…. ewww.
RESPONSE: Yeah - you’re not kidding.
March 22nd, 2006 at 9:56 pm–Brian
I think I’m going to be sick.
March 23rd, 2006 at 6:56 pmreminds me of this product, originally started as a joke:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3825221.stm
RESPONSE: YUCK! –Brian
March 24th, 2006 at 9:08 pm[…] If you think you’ve found all the bad-for-you eats you can stand, be sure to check out this new taste treat highlighted at candyaddict.com[…]
March 26th, 2006 at 11:44 pmI think my face turned green. I wonder if this is where Sam from the Bravo reality show Top Chef got his idea for chocolate-dipped chicken liver from (Oh, for crying in Manhattan, my face is now the color of an avocado!)
March 1st, 2007 at 8:40 pmhmmm I dunno, sweet and savory, chocolate and salt, might look and sound gross but should work out a treat in the mouth.
October 27th, 2007 at 3:50 amThere’s a very good reason the chocolate’s sugar free… it’s designed for people on low-carbohydrate diets. Pork rinds don’t have any carbs, but the chocolate would have if it had sugar in it.
It doesn’t sound amazingly tasty, mind you - it just sounds like someone who’s desperate for something VAGUELY like a Crunch bar but who doesn’t want the sugar!
November 13th, 2007 at 9:15 am