<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Figamajigs &#8211; the chocolate-covered fig candy that&#8217;s good for you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://candyaddict.com/blog/2006/01/05/figamajigs-the-chocolate-covered-fig-candy-thats-good-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2006/01/05/figamajigs-the-chocolate-covered-fig-candy-thats-good-for-you/</link>
	<description>Candy news, views, and reviews. All the candy that's fit to eat, and some that isn't.  All candy, all the time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:22:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Candy Addict &#187; Help! Anybody Remember Fignolia Candy?</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2006/01/05/figamajigs-the-chocolate-covered-fig-candy-thats-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-18362</link>
		<dc:creator>Candy Addict &#187; Help! Anybody Remember Fignolia Candy?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/?p=186#comment-18362</guid>
		<description>[...] Figamajigs, a possibly similar modern candy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Figamajigs, a possibly similar modern candy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel H.</title>
		<link>http://candyaddict.com/blog/2006/01/05/figamajigs-the-chocolate-covered-fig-candy-thats-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2059</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candyaddict.com/blog/?p=186#comment-2059</guid>
		<description>Well...they don&#039;t *totally* suck.

I know that dark chocolate is supposed to be more bitter than sweet, but this chocolate is really bitter. I had expected for the sweetness of the figs to balance things out but it only serves to make the chocolate bar edible. The only thing I really enjoyed was the nice texture of the figs. It&#039;s denser than truffles or nougat, but it&#039;s not as chewy as caramel. It&#039;s a really nice alternative.

I ordered the box of chocolate bars with almonds from the website because they don&#039;t sell the candy in my area. BTW, the bars are so puny, that I can actually understand why selling them by the box or by the case would be a better move. But I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll be ordering this again.

&lt;strong&gt;RESPONSE:&lt;/strong&gt; Great info! Thanks!
--Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;they don&#8217;t *totally* suck.</p>
<p>I know that dark chocolate is supposed to be more bitter than sweet, but this chocolate is really bitter. I had expected for the sweetness of the figs to balance things out but it only serves to make the chocolate bar edible. The only thing I really enjoyed was the nice texture of the figs. It&#8217;s denser than truffles or nougat, but it&#8217;s not as chewy as caramel. It&#8217;s a really nice alternative.</p>
<p>I ordered the box of chocolate bars with almonds from the website because they don&#8217;t sell the candy in my area. BTW, the bars are so puny, that I can actually understand why selling them by the box or by the case would be a better move. But I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll be ordering this again.</p>
<p><strong>RESPONSE:</strong> Great info! Thanks!<br />
&#8211;Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
